Sunday, April 18, 2010

Moisture control in the swp's/swc's

*Disclaimer - The following statements explain my thoughts on how to control the soil moisture content in a homemade self-watering container/self-watering planter, and by no means is the only method for addressing this issue. I only wanted to share what works for me, and certainly do not claim to be omnipotent on the subject, or the "messiah of swc's/swp's." I do not expect credit for any discoveries made, nor do I intend to someday become the leader of  a "following" from those that would be helped by my methods. This is what works for ME, and I live by showing - rather than telling. I do not name my swc/swp designs to make them stand out, nor do I place pictures of them onto every gardening forum on the internet. These are my thoughts, of which are freely shared with anyone that might accept them as useful information for their gardening experience.

A few years ago, I stumbled upon a growing movement of gardeners online that displayed pictures of various homemade self-watering containers that they had designed, which grew some of the best looking vegetable plants i'd ever seen grown in a container. Tomatoes, corn, peas, squash, and even pumpkins did well in them. So, I joined the movement by building several of the more popular designs on the 'net. I even told my dad that this would provide the means for growing the most beautiful tomato plants he'd ever seen. Boy...I was excited about it, to say the least.
Little did I know, that each and every design had a major flaw - which was the fact that the excessive wicking characteristics of the soil was to the point that tomatoes would achieve less than ideal results (especially in a humid environment such as mine). Blossom end rot and radial cracking of fruit became so rampant, that I personally considered the end result a complete disaster. So, being the highly educated, analytical (but bonafide redneck) person that I am, I set out to find an answer to the problem that had previously eluded all other self proclaimed swc "experts".
Rather than flooding the internet with an ever-changing design of what worked better (like Rev. 3.1, 3.2, etc.), I opted to run trials and experiment with various ways of controlling the water movement from the reservoir to the mass of soil where the plants live. In other words - I was done listening to people that obviously had more money then sense, because they had done nothing but steered me in the wrong direction, and I decided to use my knowledge and common sense to hopefully succeed where others have repeatedly failed. Being a pretty nice, sensible guy, I even attempted to give input to those that were still seeking the answers - only to be shunned and barely acknowledged. So, I was pretty much on my own, and am considered a "thread killer" anytime I post to one of the threads started by one of the more popular members of Gardenweb....

What I discovered, was that a certain sized orifice between the water reservoir and soil mass would meter the water in such a way that you can literally alter the soil moisture level to fit your needs. Some think that the soil mixture should be altered to control capillary action, but the ingredients are not readily available to everyone in different parts of the country. So, my test was performed with a growing medium that is readily available to all people that have a big box store close by. That would be Miracle Gro potting mix.

With a single 7/64" hole drilled into the wicking cup of my little 4 gallon swp constructed from 2 cat litter buckets, a broccoli plant was grown to maturity in the fall of 2009 with excellent results.Soil moisture was consistently regulated to a reading of 3-4 on the moisture meter, which is right at the beginning of the "moist" range. At that point, I knew that my orifice reduction had worked.
Still, I set out to come up with my own soilless mixture that would enhance the situation even further, by using bulk ingredients to duplicate the highly touted "ProMix BX" growing medium that had brought so many people excellent results in commercially sold Earthboxes. ProMix BX is good stuff, but expensive!
So, I came up with what I call "6:3:1", which is 6 parts peat moss/3 parts perlite/1 part vermiculite. Purchasing the ingredients in bulk is really cheap, and you'd be surprised how many containers can be filled with only $40 worth of stuff from your local farmer's cooperative...
Anyway, here's the following measurements gathered the other day from several of my swp's/swc's currently in service.


Photo below - 16 gallon swc with three 7/64" holes drilled into the bottom of a 6 oz. yogurt cup being used as a wicking basket. This particular swc is being used to grow honeydew melons.


Photo below - 4 gallon swp constructed from a single 5 gallon bucket (as seen on my blog), with a single 7/64" hole drilled into the 6 oz. wicking cup. An early girl tomato plant is being grown in it, and the reading was taken just a few days after the reservoir was initially filled with water. I'll recheck in a few days to see if it has come up any, and would love to get a reading of around 3.5 to 4.


Photo below - 34 gallon swc that has 2 margarine bowls evenly spaced for wicking baskets, and has three 7/64" holes drilled into the bottom of each one. A total of 12 cucumbers are currently planted in here, and the reading of 4 is pretty good, in my opinion.



Photo below - here's a 31 gallon rubbermaid tote with a 9"x 9" pond basket in it for the wicking basket. To reduce the "water to soil" effective area, the entire pond basket has been sealed with foil tape - then eight 7/64" holes punched through this tape for metering the water into it. I'm happy with this reading, as corn is currently being grown in it.



Photo below - Finally, here's one of my swp's constructed from 2 cat litter buckets, and the same single 7/64" hole is being utilized in this planter, too. I have a couple of cucumbers in here, and expect them to do rather nicely.


Since the 4 remaining swc's were just recently planted with tomatoes and filled with water, i'll let them settle for a week or two before taking any readings. They are of course 31 gallon rubbermaid totes that are being used to grow heirloom tomatoes in, and will be the most interesting to watch - to say the least. In reality, they are the biggest concern for me, because this will be the first trial run for this particular wicking basket/soil mixture setup. In the end, i'll certainly show the results - whether they will be good or less than ideal.

*After using them for the season, the mix and orifice combination worked out very well.....

*Update on 6/5/11

My thoughts remain the same toward the mixture being used, but I have incorporated some pine bark (about 2 parts) into each swc for the 2011 growing season. The reason is to increase drainage to offset any heavy rainfalls from over-taking the moisture control so diligently strived for - as well as more airspace into the root zone.. As you might imagine, new growing experiences have brought with them more knowledge about the subject, and incorporating more oxygen into the root zone is what i'm trying to achieve at this time.
I also understand that certain configurations provide different results in various parts of the country. In other words, what works in the Pacific Northwest won't give the same results here - and vice-versa.

Even though I have 20 swc's/swp's currently planted for the 2011 season, my preference of gardening methods would probably be a deep raised bed with the right soil mixture in it. It's much easier to maintain, has less problems with blossom end rot, and certainly looks much better, too.
However, if anyone reading this is contemplating building some homemade swc's for yourself, I hope that the contents of this post will help you in some way. My advice to you is to learn all that you can by reading about other's experiences/trials, then determine what combination works best for you in your location.

Take care, and happy gardening!

EG

20 comments:

Tom said...

Thanks for sharing this. I live in Florida and trying to fine pine bark fines has been quite a chore. I have been using SWCs filled with Miracle Gro potting mix because it is available everywhere. The results have been mixed. I will try your mix in the fall. It always seemed to me that wicking was a combination of the potting mix and the size of the opening in the wicking container. Your results seem to prove that. I also appreciate your low key approach.

GrafixMuse said...

Thank you EG for sharing your experience with SWCs/SWPs. I also chuckled at your “disclaimer.” Even before I lost my tomatoes to late blight half way through the season, I noticed the excess wicking action in my SWCs. Some tomatoes even had signs of BER. It seemed the tomatoes would just drink all that was available to them and it was difficult to keep up with filling the SWC resulting in uneven watering that I was trying to avoid. I knew something had to be changed for this to succeed.

I really appreciate you sharing what works for you and your suggestions on what to try. I am looking forward to my own experiment this year. Thank you.

Engineeredgarden said...

Tom - you're welcome. Gardeners in our similar climates really have to control the wicking, because of the heat and abundance of rainfall. I'll be sure and post my findings from the tomatoes later...

Rachel - You're welcome. Like your past experience, I too, had to haul alot of water to them last year. Tomatoes will drink continuously if you let them.

sb158 said...

Very well thought out and reasoned approach, as I would expect. I'll have to try your approach next time I make a new SWC. I wonder, though, if it'll work in my area, where it is humid, but rain in the summer is questionable, to say the least. Miraculous would be more like it.

Thomas said...

I hope your tomatoes grow well for you in those 31 gallon totes. I know of some who grows beautiful tomatoes in 15 gallon pots. Containing growing is always a hit or miss for me personally.

Engineeredgarden said...

sb - thanks, I put alot of thought into this post. Actually, with no rainfall - you have more consistent control with the moisture in the swc.

Thomas - I agree, gardening in containers is kinda tricky, and good drainage is a must.

Chandramouli S said...

Thank you, EG for sharing your experiments. I looking for alternative for the pain buckets or cat litter buckets as I'm unable to find a source for them here. Hope to find one soon and try the swcs. I love your design!

Just Jenn said...

Impressive deduction and reasoning as always.

David in Kansas said...

Good stuff. I share your observations. I have changed my wicking cups as well this year and i am already seeing a difference in the moisture level of the soil (empirically as I don't own a moisture meter). I still have one swc left and I will try the 7/64 single hole approach.
Keep on questioning and researching!

Cheryl said...

A few years ago my neighborhood Home Depot had the 2.2 compressed bags of Pro Mix for only $7.00. I can't find that stuff anywhere now. If I could find the big bags of perlite and vermiculite locally I'd give your mix a try. I'm sure it will work fine.

Kate and Crew said...

EG - I've had my SWC buckets lined up for weeks waiting for Farmer B to drill the big holes in them, but he no longer has the big hole-drilling attachment for his drill... so we have to borrow one. Sigh...

Did someone get on your case about the SWCs to warrant the disclaimer? Have people been giving you a hard time or something? I'm irritated at the thought someone has said/written something negative about your SWC tutorials???!!!!! Or am I making this up in my head? LOL.

Thx for the new info though!

Anonymous said...

The timing of your post was perfect! The day you posted this was the day I was going to finish several SWCs, so I was able to apply your 7/64 hole method. Woo!

Regarding the first two paragraphs of your post... man, there's a pretty negative tone to them. Please keep posting to the forums (that's how I discovered you!).

It's great that every year you and others in the SWC community share new designs and methods that can be used, tested, and improved upon. You're helping a ton of people. Plus, stumbling across what others have shared is how you, me, and just about everyone else got started with all this.

Thanks so much!

Daphne said...

I can see one other variable that could be an issue. When the plants get large and it is August, they could well need a lot more moisture then what they get now when it is cooler and there isn't so much foliage on the plants. In the spring my potted (not swc) tomatoes only had to be watered every 3-7 days depending on the weather and the sun. By August they needed lots of water every day. I wonder if there is a way to change the size of the hole as the plant and weather change? Anyway just a thought. If anyone can figure it all out, you can. I really can't wait to see how your pots work in the summer. I hope they do well.

Engineeredgarden said...

Anonymous - (it would be great if you'd add your name to future comments) Actually, the disclaimer was very well thought out, and was meant to sound that way......


Daphne - Correct, that definitely is a factor. If needed, i'll just top water the plants, but during the hottest part of summer is when I really want to control the soil moisture. It's gonna be interesting, to say the least....

ljbrandt said...

So what happened? How did the tomatoes turn out from using the metered (7/64" holes) wicking basket? I live in Montgomery and am looking for an alternative to using the highly touted 3:2:1 mix. If the small orifice method worked, I think I'll stick with MG or some other big box potting mix. Thanks for doing this!

Engineeredgarden said...

ljbrandt - it worked very well, but you must provide a means for rain to not overtake the moisture control. Mounded soil with the garbage bag as mulch on top works great for this...

shannon said...

EG, hoping you can give me some advice: my block has built ten swps from 31-gallon totes, with a pvc fill pipe and a platform about 3 inches from the bottom of the tote, made from the lid of the tote, with holes poked in. Our coordinator wants a 50/50 mix of potting mix (similar to promix) and compost.
I am a little worried about over-moisture and am wondering what size wicking chamber you would recommend and whether a single chamber with a single 7/64" hole or two chambers. I have 16oz and 32 oz yogurt containers for the wicking chambers.

Thanks in advance for any input you care to give--I get so much from your posts and photos!

Engineeredgarden said...

Shannon - that soil mixture is going to be horrible for drainage. However, if stuck with the combination, just throttle the water back even more. I would use a couple of 16 oz. containers for the wicking baskets, and put only one 1/8" hole into the bottom of each. I've tried all kinds of combinations, and have a pretty good feel for how to throttle the moisture under most circumstances. You'd be surprised how much water can go through a little hole, and it's the best advice I can give you for the scenario you're faced with. Hope things turn out well for ya!

Michael said...

EG,

I'm using the Earthtainer designs that you take a few swipes at in your post here to grow indeterminate tomatoes in MO.

The plants are about 6' tall now but the soil has consistently been reading "wet" all season - even when we had temps above 90 for 2 weeks with no rain. I'm concerned about the "wet" reading.

I understand that you would have covered the netpot with tape and then drilled holes - have you tried this with *indeterminate* tomatoes? Presumably the incredible size of these plants will require significant wicking by the end and before I try backing things off for my climate I'd like to know that you had some success with doing that on indeterminate tomatoes that are growing above 8' tall...

thanks

Engineeredgarden said...

Michael - I have most definitely tried indeterminates in the swc's that had their wicking baskets altered, and they performed well. Even when the plants got to at least 7-8 ft. tall, plants weren't starved for water...I'm sorry that you were also influenced into spending hard-earned money on building these "idiotainers" that continue to cause problems....